As you learn new skills and strategies and train to improve as an athlete, accepting feedback is a necessary part of the process. And the delivery of any comments or feedback can have a significant impact on you as an athlete.
There is a difference between feedback and criticism. One is usually better received and yields better results than the other. So, what is the difference between the two terms? And which is better for athletes who are working to improve in their sport?
Criticism is passing judgment or fault-finding.
Criticism tends to involve a harsh delivery that shames or embarrasses the recipient. A person delivering criticism focuses comments more on the person instead of that person’s actions.
Feedback is sharing constructive or remedial comments.
Feedback differs from criticism because of its evaluative component. Rather than passing judgment on a person, feedback is all about providing suggestions on how to improve.
Here are a few more features of feedback that differentiate it from criticism:
1. Respectful
Mutual respect is an essential element in the athlete-instructor relationship. An instructor or coach who respectfully delivers feedback is more likely to motivate an athlete to act on that feedback. At the same time, feedback is better received by an athlete who respects his or her coach.
2. Productive
Productive feedback where the comments are intentional and purposeful is more likely to encourage an athlete to listen. And not all feedback has to be corrective. There are also times to listen and get feedback from an instructor on what you’re doing right.
3. Focus on Future Improvement
Where criticism may focus on past mistakes or imperfections, feedback focuses on how to make improvements in the future. Calling out what you’re doing wrong is criticism. But when it’s followed by how you can improve in the future, then it’s feedback.
To learn more about Classic Fight Team in Fountain Valley and our current programs and classes, contact us today.
